Facility Response Plans (FRPs) for oil facilities are a big part of compliance with federal Oil Pollution Prevention regulations. But determining whether or not you need one can be tricky.

If you are required to comply with the Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) rule defined under the federal Oil Pollution Prevention regulations, you may also have to address the regulation’s second set of requirements – the FRP rule. Or you may not.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) FRP rule applies to certain non-transportation related facilities that use or store oil “of any kind or in any form…” FRPs are required to address a facility’s response to a worst case discharge of oil and to a substantial threat of such a discharge to the maximum extent practicable. That much is easy to understand, but how does EPA define which facilities are covered under the FRP rule?

The number one determining factor is that of a “substantial harm facility,” which, in this rule is defined as “a facility that, because of its location, could reasonably be expected to cause substantial harm to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters or adjoining shorelines.”  While this definition may also seem simple, it is important to understand that the definition of “navigable waters” covers pretty much every surface water scenario, and then some.

The EPA provides this definition:

Navigable waters are not only waters on which a craft may be launched. They also include the following types of waters their tributaries and adjacent wetlands:

  • Waters with a past, present or possible future use in interstate or foreign commerce including waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide;
  • Interstate waters, including interstate wetlands;
  • All other waters whose use, degradation, or destruction could affect interstate or foreign commerce; these may include intrastate lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, playa lakes, or natural ponds;
  • Impoundments of waters that are defined as waters of the United States; and
  • Territorial sea.”

According to EPA, there are two primary ways a facility can be classified a substantial harm facility:

  • The facility meets the criteria for substantial harm defined in 40 CFR 12.20 (f)(1), or
  • An EPA regional administrator determines a facility poses substantial harm to the environment.

Substantial harm criteria follow a logical progression to define coverage under the FRP rule by starting with the highest potential for harm. The first level is for those who perform “over water transfers” of oil to or from vessels and with a oil storage capacity equal to or greater than 42,000 (gal). If this describes your operations, you must prepare and submit an FRP to the RA. If your facility does not fit this description the next question is, how much oil storage capacity do you have? If it is less than 1,000,000 gal, you do not have to submit an FRP.

However, facilities with oil storage capacity at or above 1 million gal will then proceed to answer additional questions and an affirmative answer to any of these “substantial harm factors” will trigger the need for an FRP. These questions address:

  • The lack of adequate secondary containment for the largest aboveground storage tank (including freeboard) within any aboveground storage tank area;
  • The location of the facility and potential for a discharge that would injure fish, wildlife and sensitive environments;
  • The location of a facility and potential for a discharge to shut down a public drinking water intake; and
  • The facility’s reportable spills greater than or equal to 10,000 gal within the past 5 years.

If your facility is able to answer “no” to all of these questions, you may not be required to prepare and submit an FRP. However, facilities that do not have to comply with the FRP rule must complete a Certification of Substantial Harm and maintain it with your SPCC Plan at your facility.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgated the Oil Pollution Prevention regulations to define facilities’ oil spill potential and take proactive measures to upgrade spill prevention measures and prepare facility staff to respond appropriately. Thus, in addition to the Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) rule EPA also requires Facility Response Planning (FRP) for facilities that meet certain criteria.

Substantial harm facilities must prepare and submit to their EPA regional administrator an FRP; while facilities that do meet the criteria, are not required to submit a FRP but rather must complete and maintain onsite a Certification of Substantial Harm.

Significant and substantial harm facilities meet a number of requirements that set them apart from substantial harm facilities. For example, they may meet the over-water transfer criterion, have a storage capacity equal to or greater than 1million gallons (gal) and answered yes to one or more of the “substantial harm factors.” You may recall from yesterday these relate to lack of appropriate secondary containment, potential for spills causing injury to fish or wildlife, potential for a discharge that would shut down a public water intake, and reportable spills equal to or greater than 10,000 gal within the past 5 years.

In addition to these criteria, the EPA regional administrator may also consider other substantial harm factors such as:

  • Frequency of past spills,
  • Proximity to navigable waters,
  • Age of oil tanks, and
  • Other facility- and region-specific information including local health impacts.

The third category covered under the FRP rule is that of the complex, which is a facility that has both transportation-related and non-transportation-related activities and is thus regulated by both EPA and another regulatory agency such as the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), the U.S. Coast guard (USCG) or the Office of Pipeline Safety under the DOT. Complex facilities have equally complex compliance requirements to determine where one agency’s jurisdiction stops and another’s starts. Moreover, when determining worst-case scenarios and other quantity-oriented calculations, complex facilities must compare their calculated discharge volumes for each agency to determine how to plan for the greatest possible discharge.

Regardless of your facility’s FRP rule category, there are a few additional requirements that everyone must meet.

  • Each FRP must be in compliance with 40 CFR part 112 and any amendments;
  • FRPs must be reviewed annually to ensure consistency with relative portions of the National Contingency Plan and any applicable Area Contingency Plan
  • FRPs must be reviewed periodically to include changes at the facility (as defined in 40 CFR 112.20(g)(1), (2), and (3)) and revised portions of the FRP must be submitted to the EPA regional administrator “within 60 days of any change that may materially affect the response to a worst case discharge.”

In addition, the FRP and any plan updates must be maintained onsite at your facility. You must also maintain a log of your required response training and drills and you must retain records of response equipment inspections for 5 years.

For more information or assistance with your Environmental and Health & Safety regulatory compliance needs, contact Ralph Carito at Total Environmental & Safety, LLC (Total) at rcarito@TotalEnviron.com or 908-442-8599.